🔗 Share this article

Around the globe, governments are channeling enormous sums into the concept of “sovereign AI” – developing their own machine learning models. From the city-state of Singapore to Malaysia and Switzerland, states are competing to create AI that comprehends native tongues and cultural specifics.

The Global AI Arms Race

This movement is an element in a broader worldwide competition led by tech giants from the United States and China. Whereas companies like a leading AI firm and a social media giant invest massive funds, developing countries are also placing independent bets in the artificial intelligence domain.

However amid such tremendous amounts in play, is it possible for less wealthy countries attain notable benefits? As noted by an expert from a prominent policy organization, “Unless you’re a affluent nation or a big company, it’s quite a hardship to build an LLM from the ground up.”

National Security Issues

Numerous nations are unwilling to depend on foreign AI systems. Throughout the Indian subcontinent, for example, Western-developed AI systems have sometimes fallen short. An illustrative instance involved an AI assistant used to educate students in a isolated area – it interacted in the English language with a thick American accent that was hard to understand for local students.

Furthermore there’s the national security aspect. In India’s defence ministry, relying on particular external systems is considered inadmissible. Per an founder commented, There might be some random training dataset that could claim that, for example, Ladakh is not part of India … Utilizing that certain AI in a military context is a major risk.”

He further stated, I’ve consulted people who are in the military. They wish to use AI, but, setting aside certain models, they don’t even want to rely on US platforms because details may be transferred outside the country, and that is totally inappropriate with them.”

Domestic Efforts

As a result, some states are supporting domestic ventures. An example such a initiative is being developed in the Indian market, in which a company is working to create a sovereign LLM with government funding. This project has committed about 1.25 billion dollars to AI development.

The developer foresees a AI that is significantly smaller than top-tier systems from US and Chinese firms. He states that the country will have to compensate for the financial disparity with expertise. Based in India, we lack the advantage of investing massive funds into it,” he says. “How do we contend against say the enormous investments that the US is pumping in? I think that is where the fundamental knowledge and the strategic thinking comes in.”

Native Emphasis

Throughout the city-state, a state-backed program is backing AI systems trained in local regional languages. These dialects – including Malay, Thai, the Lao language, Indonesian, Khmer and others – are frequently underrepresented in American and Asian LLMs.

I hope the people who are building these national AI models were conscious of the extent to which and how quickly the cutting edge is advancing.

A senior director participating in the initiative says that these tools are designed to complement more extensive systems, as opposed to substituting them. Tools such as ChatGPT and another major AI system, he states, frequently have difficulty with regional languages and culture – interacting in awkward the Khmer language, for instance, or proposing meat-containing meals to Malaysian consumers.

Developing native-tongue LLMs permits local governments to incorporate local context – and at least be “smart consumers” of a advanced tool built elsewhere.

He adds, “I’m very careful with the term sovereign. I think what we’re trying to say is we wish to be more accurately reflected and we aim to comprehend the capabilities” of AI systems.

Cross-Border Cooperation

For countries trying to carve out a role in an escalating global market, there’s an alternative: join forces. Experts associated with a prominent policy school have suggested a public AI company distributed among a alliance of emerging states.

They call the initiative “Airbus for AI”, in reference to the European successful initiative to build a alternative to a major aerospace firm in the mid-20th century. Their proposal would involve the establishment of a state-backed AI entity that would combine the assets of different nations’ AI projects – for example the United Kingdom, the Kingdom of Spain, Canada, the Federal Republic of Germany, the nation of Japan, Singapore, the Republic of Korea, the French Republic, the Swiss Confederation and Sweden – to establish a competitive rival to the Western and Eastern major players.

The main proponent of a paper setting out the initiative says that the concept has attracted the attention of AI leaders of at least several states to date, along with a number of national AI organizations. Although it is presently centered on “developing countries”, emerging economies – Mongolia and Rwanda among them – have also shown curiosity.

He comments, “Nowadays, I think it’s an accepted truth there’s less trust in the commitments of the present US administration. People are asking like, should we trust these technologies? In case they opt to