🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have voted to pull out from an international accord created to protect women from violence, including domestic abuse, following extensive and heated debates in the parliament.

Several thousand of demonstrators assembled in the capital this week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate authority now rests with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or veto the proposed law.

Referred to as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only took effect in Latvia last year, mandating governments to develop laws and support services to end all types of abuse.

Latvia has become the initial EU country to begin the procedure of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation withdrew in 2021, a decision that human rights organizations described as a major setback for gender equality.

Ideological Controversy and Opposition

The international agreement was ratified by the EU in last year, yet conservative factions have argued that its focus on gender equality weakens family values and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Latvian parliament, MPs voted by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a move proposed by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a defeat for centre-right government leader Evika Silina, who stood with demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse does not triumph," she declared to the crowd.

Political Disagreements and Responses

One of the main parties supporting the exit is a nationalist party, whose head has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

The nation's ombudswoman Karina Palkova urged the agreement not to be politicized, while the group Equality Now asserted it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent decision has sparked widespread outcry both within Latvia and internationally.

22,000 individuals have signed a national appeal demanding the convention to be preserved. The gender equality group the rights center has announced a protest for the coming week, accusing MPs of disregarding the wishes of the nation's citizens.

Global Worries and Potential Future Actions

The head of the European organization's legislative body commented that Latvia had made a rash choice fueled by false information. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning step backward for women's rights and human rights in the continent".

He added that since Turkey abandoned the convention four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not secure a two-thirds majority, the president could possibly send back the legislation for additional consideration if he has concerns.

Head of State Rinkevics stated on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to legal requirements, "considering state and legal considerations, rather than belief-based perspectives".

Last week, another component of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, suggested it would not rule out appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a worrisome situation for gender equality not only in our nation but across Europe," stated a human rights activist.

• Family violence rates have been increasing in multiple EU nations
• The European treaty mandates specific safeguards for survivors of gender-based violence
• Latvia's vote could influence comparable discussions in additional EU countries